RESEARCH
Every book requires research. Even if it’s set in your hometown and your protagonist is a whole lot like you, there will be some moment where you’re not sure of a fact – was the corner store there in 1994? Is it 15 miles to Waverly or 16? – and you will, in some way, do research.
What you choose to do with the facts you find, that’s trickier.
My first book, The Kitchen Daughter, is coming out next April. On one hand, I chose to “write what I know” – the protagonist is a passionate home cook (as I am) who lives in Philadelphia (as I did). On the other hand, she also has a sister (which I don’t) and, as the book opens, she has just lost both her parents (an experience I am fortunate enough not to have). And, most importantly, Ginny also struggles with Asperger’s syndrome – which, when I started writing about her in 2007, I knew next to nothing about.
I threw myself into research. Books, blogs, message boards, conversations, critiques, going in a dozen directions.
Read MoreI know Kathleen and Therese meant well when they asked me to offer my best writing advice, but I gotta tell you, the idea that I could presume to do so after being here less than three months? With the pedigree of you folks? Oy. The very concept made me break out in hives.
Fortunately, as a parent I’ve built up my tolerance for irony poisoning. Also, besides Therese and Kathleen, I have a small cadre of people who believe me capable of rising to the challenge.
A posse of possibility, if you will.
Hence the basis of my suggestion: Find yourself a supportive writing community (or communities), acknowledge your membership for the privilege it is, then pay it both forward and back.
Here’s my rationale: Sooner or later, everyone who writes will feel as if they are failing. It might be as simple as a bad day in the chair or as complex as being cut loose by a publisher mid-series. We all have our own literary Achilles heel.
Challenges are quite simply easier to endure when surrounded by good people. They don’t have to be writers, but it helps. (And it’ll take a load off your partner and/or family, who by now wish you would dangle by your own participle.) It’s just important they can genuinely hear you, validate your experience, then, after allowing you sufficient time to mope, shove you back into the world with hopeful expectation and resources.
As Nietzsche said, “He who has a why to live can bear with almost any how.” The right group will help you build a repertoire of both hows and whys faster than you can do on your own.
A few things to consider:
Read MorePlease welcome guest contributor Jeanne Kisacky to WU. Scholar and architectural historian, Jeanne was a finalist in our search for our unpubbed contributor, and we thought her essay was fantastic.
Jeanne tells us “I’m a recovering architect (anyone interested in joining the charter chapter of Architects Anonymous, please contact me); and an escaped editor. For the next nine months I’m a chained-to-the-desk nonfiction writer (I hate deadlines). But when the chains are removed and the recovery is over, I will return to my epic novel. When I do, I resolve to stop writing like Salieri. The composition of “Too Many Words” is going to meet, and learn to fear, the red pen.”
So she knows a thing or two about research-aholism. Thanks for sharing with us, Jeanne. Enjoy!
Since most writers are readers, research is one of the joys of the profession. Research is also crucial to good writing–it provides necessary details for writers to write convincing, resonant, accurate scenes. It fuels creative thought. While you research the details of your topic, some deep part of your psyche is figuring out how to use those details in your story.
There is, however, a dark side to research. Like watching TV, it is a passive activity. And, like TV, sometimes it is hard to stop the sitting and start the doing. As the information piles up on your desktop and in your brain, it becomes overwhelming. Doubts creep in about how to finish the darned thing that is now so big it’s out of your control. You’ve become a researchaholic.
The only cure is to put writing back into its proper place.
Read MoreI promised you a post on building Facebook ads, and this is it. I know, I know, you can barely contain your excitement!
So why Facebook ads? Facebook ads are something the marketing team at Shaye Areheart Books recommended I try, since I wanted to contribute to my book’s campaign. They were easy to set up, they said, not to mention customizable in order to target the right demographics. They could also be an uber inexpensive marketing option. While I contributed to my marketing campaign in other ways, this was one area that would be all me. I would need to set up the ads, establish my price points, monitor everything, etc…
Where to begin? I found this handy guide to setting up a Facebook ad on eHow, and decided to time myself. How quickly might I be able to do this?
Read MoreSherri — a regular reader at my weblog — asked me recently what books I’d recommend to somebody who has just started writing fiction. It’s a reasonable question, as there are about a bazillion how-to-write-a best-selling-novel-and-get-published books out there.
There are several distinct subcategories of the writing-related how-to books — craft, theory, inspiration, marketing/sales, reference, exercise — and in each of these there are good and bad (that is, less than useful) books. I personally am primarily interested in books that fall into the areas of craft, inspiration, and reference.
Reference books aimed directly at writers have to be approached with great caution. Some of them are expertly put together. For example:
Read MoreWhen I started writing historical fiction seriously (approximately 1995) I was still on the faculty at the University of Michigan. This meant that I had a fantastic library at my disposal. Faculty could (and probably still can) send an email or call and say, here’s a list of books and articles I need. Later that day, the books would arrive at your office door. The article would be copied and delivered, too, even if it had to come from another library.
You could keep the book as long as you needed it, unless it was recalled by another faculty member or student. I held onto some books for the full ten-plus years I was there. If it turned out to be no use to me, the library person would take it away again.
Spoiled? You betcha. And blissfully happy.
Then I left academia and for a good long while I was really stuck. In the early 2000s, there was not much available online. I ended up buying a couple hundred books — some of them which turned out to be no use to me — and paying for the copying of hundreds of articles. Some books were simply out of my budget range. Sometimes I was able to get a banged up reading copy. Thacher’s New American Dispensatory (1802) was something I really needed, but the copies I found were all between $500 and $3,000. I eventually got hold of a so-called reading copy, which means the book is in such bad shape that it’s not really collectible. I paid $60 for it, and it was well worth the expense.
In general though, this process of tracking down references was frustrating to the extreme, not to mention expensive. If I wanted to collect books, I would not be complaining. In fact, many of the books I need I would like to have in hard cover, but this is for research and I don’t need the beautiful tooled leather and gilded edges.
I keep thinking I could put at least fifty books (all out of print) up for sale at Amazon or Ebay or one of the bigger used-book conglomerates. Eventually I’ll do that. But even if I regained a good portion of what I spent, that wouldn’t address the bigger problem. Public libraries are generally really good about inter-library loans, but the things I need are often so unusual and rare that the ILL system soon sways under the burden.
And then Google Books came along. Google decided to scan books — all books, every book they could get) and make them available and searchable online. This caused huge (and well founded) consternation among authors like me, who pay the mortgage with royalty checks. If you could read The Pajama Girls for Lambert Square for free, would you buy a copy? Most people would not. So the Authors Guild stepped in and the lawyers got busy and in the end there was an agreement and a settlement. The Electric Frontier Foundation summarizes the situation (read the whole article here):
Read MoreFebruary is Plot Month at WU. Back in 2006, I road-tested THE WRITER’S JOURNEY by Christopher Vogler to see if it was an efficient (notice I didn’t say easy) method of plotting a book. Two manuscripts later, I’m still using Vogler as the foundation for my stories. It’s been the best method for me to date.
I’m reposting my Road Test of Vogler for those who missed my first post. I’m also interested in hearing from writers who’ve used Vogler in the past. Did you find his method useful? Nightmarish? Let us know in the comments. Thanks!
Regular readers may know that I’ve recently completed my current WIP using Holly Lisle’s One-Pass Manuscript Revision process. You can read the gory details HERE. After a break, it was time to get back into the saddle. I’d agreed to participate in NaNo, and I needed to get a story plotted out to a point where I’d be writing something that actually resembled a novel instead of a mishmash of scenes with no direction.My usual approach to plotting was loosely based on Debra Dixon’s Goal, Motivation, and Conflict method, vague character sketches, an ending, and a theme I wanted to examine. I’d knock out an outline, and get to work.
Then everything’d go to hell in a handbasket. Plot tangents, characters that had nothing to do with the story except they were cool when they wandered into my head the night before, blind alleys, you name it. Sometimes the lack of discipline would be exciting. Great things would come of the exploration, and it’s what I love about writing. Other times . . . . eecch. So I’d have this rough draft which was mostly a steaming pile of poo and it would take six months to edit.
NO MORE! I cried. This time, I’d use a plotting method that would give me the storytelling structure I wanted, while allowing for exploration and creativity. My writing bud Elena Greene had been telling me good things about Christopher Vogler’s mythic structure method, outlined in his book THE WRITER’S JOURNEY, (its on our WU recommended list) so I decided to give it a go.
How did it measure up?
Read MoreKath here. Today’s post is the first from WU’s newest contributor, Rosina Lippi. Enjoy!
For the historical novelist – for anyone interested in history – the internet has brought about a revolution. We are floating in a sea of information that deepens and spreads minute by minute. It’s incredibly empowering, but it also has its dangers.
If you came of age before the internet, you will remember how things were. An argument over supper about any given war could not be resolved by opening a laptop. If it was a Saturday night, you were most probably clueless until Monday, when you could call a reference librarian or go there yourself. A million questions, small and large, simply remained unanswered, and we lived with that. The capital of Peru, the author of Antigone, where Napoleon was held captive, when women got the vote – if you didn’t have access to a good encyclopedia, you wondered or started calling friends in the vain hope that one of them would know when Wrigley Field was built.
Since that time, we have gone from one extreme to the other. At two in the morning I can crawl through newspaper archives to find out the rent on a typical three bedroom apartment in Manhattan in the year 1900. I can look at museum exhibits on Edwardian dress or Bronze Age artifacts, or read an article on bovine diseases. As more and more becomes available on-line, things only get better. Or worse, depending on your perspective. My husband, the Mathematician, has developed a particular expression he puts on whenever I start a sentence did you know: Just interested enough to prove that he is listening; just distant enough to discourage me from telling him exactly how pencils were manufactured in 1800. If I’m particularly animated about something I’ve found, he will raise an eyebrow a half inch or so to acknowledge my discovery.
And that’s fair enough. I don’t understand anything about his work, either.
Read MoreKath here. As part of my ongoing effort to find the perfect way to organize a mess when it comes to notes and research, I asked blogger Lisa Janice Cohen if she would share her organizing tool, TiddlyWikiWrite, and I was thrilled when she agreed. Lisa (left) created TiddlyWikiWrite out of an existing wiki platform (ingenious) into a tool that she calls a “virtual index card”. It seems simple enough for a luddite like me to use.
About Lisa: She lives in the western suburbs of Boston, MA with her husband, 2 sons, and assorted pets (currently one dog and one rat). When she’s not reading, writing, or editing, she’s a physical therapist. Lisa is also the head moderator of Wild Poetry Forum. She has recently completed her fourth novel and is actively querying for a literary agent. Her writing related blog can be found at: https://www.ljcbluemuse.blogspot.com/.
Enjoy!
Introduction
Most every writer will need some sort of organizational structure for writing a novel regardless of where you fall on the spectrum of plotter versus pantser. If you are a plotter, you write to a structured outline, with a significant and extensive amount of pre-planning. If you are a pantser, you let fingers fly on the keyboard in a gush of unfettered creativity. In reality, this dichotomy represents the two extreme ends of a spectrum and every writer uses some system to keep all the bits and pieces of a story together. There are likely as many ways to organize the writing of a novel as there are writers. If you are digitally inclined, a wiki is one technological solution to staying organized no matter what kind of writer you are.
Read MoreI’m currently in NYC! Today I meet my agent, Elisabeth Weed, and yesterday I met my new editor, Sarah Knight. I’ll tell you more about these meetings when I get back home. For now, I wanted to share an idea I had with you, something that occurred to me while straightening my desk the other day and happening upon some old notes.
You remember the agent who’d commented on my manuscript, who then had the opportunity to read it again at the recommendation of his colleague? Well, what I didn’t tell you at the time was that 2nd read resulted in quite a long talk with the agent. He not only spoke with me about how his vision for the work differed from mine, he also acknowledged that he could be wrong and gave me a list of other agents to consider, along with several books he thought my story might be comparable to. But here’s the really interesting part: When I went through that list, I realized that several of the books mentioned were published by (or otherwise linked to) Shaye Areheart Books, my new publisher. If I’d searched deals made to SAB, I would’ve stumbled upon a small list of agents who’d sold there. Who had connections with editors there. Who might’ve been looking for other writers to place in exactly that house.
And I would’ve seen Elisabeth’s name on that list.
Hmm…
Maybe another strategy when you’re trying to find an agent–especially for a fuzzy-genre manuscript–is to approach the agent hunt in exactly this inside-out way. Here’s how.
Read MoreSome of you may already know about this approach, but this can be a valuable tip for those who don’t, so I’ll risk boring the savvy ones with this info.
First, keep your entire book manuscript in one electronic file—it’s a huge time-saver. I know writers who use a separate file on their computer for each chapter of their book. Each of my novels is in one file—the whole thing. It would drive me nuts to have to open up, let’s say, a file for chapter 9 in order to check on information I needed for a scene in chapter 22—for example, maybe I need to make sure where I stashed a clue back in chapter 9 that now needs to be discovered in 22.
A file-per-chapter writer friend didn’t see how I could do the whole-ms-in-one-file thing and be able to navigate successfully.
The key is using bookmarks to move quickly and easily around a complete novel manuscript.
With the Microsoft Word and WordPerfect Bookmark tools, wherever you are in a manuscript you can insert a bookmark and easily come back to it from any other place in the manuscript. I used it frequently in putting this book together to jump from where I was writing to a previous section to check on something in another section. I’d insert the letter “a” as a bookmark where I was, go to where I needed to go, and then just use the bookmark to hop back. I use “a” because it comes up at the top of the bookmark list. And you can use it over and over—when needing to do the same thing further on in the manuscript, when I went to insert a bookmark the “a” was at the top of the list and it was simple to just click “insert” and have the “a” bookmark in the new place.
Read MoreFirst off, I want to thank you all for your congrats. This has been a wild few weeks, for sure. And, since Therese Fowler removed her supergirl mask in comments, I’d like to say a public thanks to her, too–my willing pre-publication blurber. Thanks, Therese! You’re the best of the best!
Okay, on to today’s post…
A funny thing happened shortly after I landed my fabulous agent: I imagined a new story. Just like that. I could see her–my quirky protagonist with her dark aura and strange quest. I fell in fast love and just knew it: this would be the next story I’d write.
The idea didn’t come entirely out of the blue. Once upon a time, I considered writing a follow up to Unbounded and wrote about 200 pages of a script. I dusted it off recently and looked at it with fresh eyes. Not right. Too much a mess to inspire anything but the call from my recycling bin. But a few CPs reminded me of a scene that lay somewhere in the rubble–set in the mountains of West Virginia. Full of atmosphere, a little creepy, mysterious. I re-read it and felt a shot of ice through my bones. This was the setting of my next story.
My protagonist came alive shortly after that–a physically damaged girl with ethereal yearnings that send her and her sister on the strangest of all quests. Along the way, they’ll meet others, affect them. They’ll all be changed.
Story bones are so important. What’s your theme? How can you spindle it out, focus it in? Where does your character begin? What is her journey, her arc? Ironically, digging for story bones links back to my beginnings at a writer–my time as a researcher. Here’s where you find the gold…
Read MoreA really interesting set of studies came out of Johns Hopkins recently, showing what happened to jazz performers when improvising music. Are there lessons here for writers, too?
This, from Science Daily:
A pair of Johns Hopkins and government scientists have discovered that when jazz musicians improvise, their brains turn off areas linked to self-censoring and inhibition, and turn on those that let self-expression flow… (The research) sheds light on the creative improvisation that artists and non-artists use in everyday life, the investigators say…
“When jazz musicians improvise, they often play with eyes closed in a distinctive, personal style that transcends traditional rules of melody and rhythm,” says Charles J. Limb, M.D., assistant professor in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and a trained jazz saxophonist himself. “It’s a remarkable frame of mind,” he adds, “during which, all of a sudden, the musician is generating music that has never been heard, thought, practiced or played before. What comes out is completely spontaneous.”
Read More