Is Collaborative Writing on the rise? And Making the Most of It
By Heather Webb | August 23, 2018 |

https://www.hci.org/
There’s no disputing that social media has disrupted and changed, perhaps forever, the way we receive and deliver information. It has also changed how we read—and because of this, I think it goes without saying that it has influenced our stylistic choices as writers. But another phenomenon seems to be emerging, beyond style and digitized text: the rise in collaborative works. In the television and film world, multiple collaborators on any one project is nothing new, but then, most of those writers work in one room, spit-balling ideas off of each other. But it’s hard to imagine making this work in the novel writing world when we’re scattered across the globe. Yet it’s happening, and we very likely have social media to thank for this.
We’re all so much more accessible, for one, but we also have the ability to work “side by side” and “simultaneously” via Google Docs. (Some tell me they work in a joint Scrivener account or via a single Word Doc emailed back and forth as well, though that sounds cumbersome to be honest.)
Social media is certainly one of the big instigators, but collaborative works might also be popularizing because of other factors. For example, authors have been forced to become entrepreneurial. In doing so, we have realized the essential need to work together with others to promote our works. Two heads really are better than one in this case. Another factor in the rise of collaborative novels, is our need to find new ways to break into the increasingly tight book market. When you fuse the audiences of two authors together, you’ve doubled your reach. More and more of us are seeing the value in this approach.
Collaborative works can be seen problematic from a sales standpoint, however, as it encourages the book glut, one of the bigger problems in the industry. After all, many of us are now writing twice the number of books. Some publishers are also hesitant to pick up these works because the contracts become more complicated, as does the editorial and sales process. Still, perhaps all of this buddying up is bringing a wonderful array of new and unique projects with fresh voices.
In fact, from a writer’s standpoint, collaboration carries quite a few pros and cons, so you choose to go down this road, it’s important to weigh all the factors. For example:
The positives of collaborating
- First and foremost, you’re splitting the workload. This is always a huge plus. I find I can safely co-write a novel and simultaneously work on my own novel on the side because the load is shared.
- One of the bigger joys of co-writing is sharing in the milestones during the writing and editing process with a partner/friend who understands the book and characters only as you do. There’s nothing like the two of you jumping for joy when you wrap that first draft.
- When there are pitfalls or unexpected turbulence as there often is in the making and publishing of a book, you have someone to lean on and with whom to commiserate.
- Another, and perhaps the best aspect of co-writing is the wonderful shared excitement of seeing the book sell, watching the foreign sales roll in as well as the reviews, and if you’re lucky, hitting lists! In some ways, the entire process is more meaningful when you can celebrate with each other.
- You have a chance to push your craft to a new level, as you learn how to weave your skills and views together with someone else’s. It’s amazing what I’ve learned!
- It’s just plain fun, working with someone else.
But there’s always a flip side, so let’s look at…
The challenges of collaborating
- Choose your partner(s) wisely. Best friends don’t always make the best working partners. You need to share the same work ethic, communicate well, and be flexible. Sometimes you won’t find this out until you begin a project and issues arise, so be ready to abandon ship if doesn’t appear to be working.
- Be certain you and your partner share the same vision for the characters’ personalities, motivations, and arcs. (The same goes for the plot, but that never seems to cause the same level of intensity in a dispute as with characters. They’re nearer to our hearts.)
- Finding time to write with multiple schedules can make things difficult and chaotic, so you have to decide on something realistic and COMMIT. Again, back to similar work ethics.
- Your social media and promotional efforts have now doubled. Decisions need to be made about websites and Facebook pages, and how all of these important items will be handled. Perhaps appointing duties here would help.
- Leave your ego at the door. It’s not about who is right, but what best serves the story and the characters, so sometimes you have to let go of an idea that isn’t working and be open to something totally different. It doesn’t make the other writer better than you, and you aren’t better than them. It all comes out in the wash in the end.
And just for fun, here are a few collaborative writing teams, I’ve noticed of late:
Hazel Gaynor & me
Liz Fenton & Lisa Steinke
Stephanie Dray & Laura Kamoie
Beatriz Williams, Karen White, & Lauren Willig
Then there are the two-people writing teams who publish under one pen name like Liv Constantine, authors of The Last Mrs. Parrish. And finally, there are the large, multi-person teams who write novels (not anthologies!) together like the History 360 team. I recently co-wrote a French Revolution era novel with the History 360 team with five other authors. It was insane and fun, and one of the most challenging projects I’ve ever worked on.
I’m curious about your thoughts on this trend and about collaborating in general. Do you think there’s a link between social media and collaborative writing projects? What about indie publishing and self-publishing? Do you think these aspects of the publishing business have contributed to this phenomenon? Is this a good or bad thing? Would you ever try it?
Heather, there’s a direct social media link between me and my “newest” (writing took two years and revising it has been going on two years now) novel’s collaboration: I met my pal Rick ten years ago in a private online network built by Seth Godin, found that we shared many perspectives and whimsies, and I ended up editing his first novel.
Our later writing work together (using Google Docs) has been fun, demanding and exciting, in all of the positive ways you mentioned. We’ve had only minor disagreements on the novel’s structure and characterization and have resolved those apace. I wrote about our collaboration here on WU a while back: https://staging-writerunboxed.kinsta.cloud/2016/07/26/writing-collaborations-or-whose-hands-are-on-that-keyboard/
We have (fanfare of trumpets!) finished the book and are setting it up to be self-published in the late fall. I’ve been emailing Amazon about a number of issues about author page displays of collaborative works and splitting/electronic deposits of royalties and the like and have received some wrinkles back in the mails, but I think they will be smoothed.
I feel lucky in how well the collaborative process worked for us, and I’d try it again if the project and personalities were right. Thanks!
Tom, that’s an excellent point–the issues with the way collaborative works are displayed at Amazon. The same is true with Goodreads. Only the first author’s name (alphabetically) shows in all of the “also boughts” as well as the bios, etc. It’s kind of a pain that way. I’ve written to GR and they’ve just said, “that’s the way we do it”, but it needs to be remedied for sure.
I’ll have to check out your article. Thanks for sharing the link! Wishing you loads of success with your book!
I’ve been studying a lot of material on writing for TV or film, which typically ends up being VERY collaborative. On one hand, I find the notion of a team of writers pooling their talents to create a kick-ass script both exciting and inspiring. But on the other, I have a REALLY hard time imagining myself being a good fit for that environment.
Here’s why: I’ve spent pretty much my entire life in collaborative projects, with decades as a professional musician playing in bands, and also for the past 20 years as a member of various corporate writing teams. And I have to say, one of the BIG appeals of writing fiction is that for once in my life – at least during the creation process – I have complete control. After so many years going through the compromises and diplomatic challenges of collaborating to create something, the idea of just getting to do something MY way is very appealing.
So while I agree with your premise, and believe the internet is making it easier to collaborate than ever, I currently have no interest in writing fiction with somebody else.
But ask me again next month, and I may have a different answer!
I know exactly what you mean, Keith. The aspect of being diplomatic and incorporating everyone else’s views can really push us at times and it’s not always a good time. lol. In larger groups, in particular, there is almost always one person who melts down at one point or other, or doesn’t do their share, or acts like a diva. This is where I think designating a decision-maker or point person at the beginning is hugely important. They can make tough decisions or crack down on someone in the group if necessary. But yeah, having complete control is hugely satisfying, there’s no doubt!
Thanks for your insight!
Kristy Montee and Kelly Nichols are sisters who write as P. J. Parrish. They’re doing something right because I can’t tell where one sister ends and the other begins.
Connie Willis wrote with a partner (at least once) and said that it was difficult.
It’s really cool when you can blend your voices well with others, as long as your visions for the character voice are similar. I’ll have to look up P.J. Parrish! Thanks for stopping by today.