Theft by Finding

By Catherine McKenzie  |  April 24, 2018  | 

I’m not the first to say it, but being a writer can sometimes be a peculiar profession. The things one Googles, for instance (it’s research, NSA!), and the thoughts that can creep into your head at the worst moments while you’re in the middle of living. Or worse, when others are in the middle of dying.

Years and years ago an idea popped into my head. It was an interesting idea—to me at least—and we writers guard our interesting ideas. They don’t happen every day, you know, so when they do, it can be an exciting moment. Only this idea—what if someone used a national tragedy to disappear—came to me on day two or three of the 9/11 coverage, when family members began pinning pictures of the missing to that chain link fence. You know the one. You were probably watching that same coverage and thinking how sad it was, because it was sad. I was thinking it that too, but there was also that nagging thought, prompted by one of those weird little life coincidences that happens sometimes, because someone close to me stood on the top of the World Trade Center two weeks before the bombing. Or, at least, that’s where he told me he was going to be. How did I know? How did anyone know? And then there were all the people being interviewed who were supposed to be on this plane or that…Ack, what the hell was wrong with me?

The moment passed, but the thought lingered. I mean, it must’ve happened sometime in the course of history, right? I couldn’t be the only one who thought this way? And if I was, what did it say about me?

No writer should ask themselves that question, let me tell you.

Years later, I heard a story on the news about a man who’d abandoned his family and then returned twenty years later. I don’t remember all the details, now, but that sparked something, too. It reminded me of my earlier thought and added others. It was sticky, that story, it stuck with me. Because: who would do such a thing? But also: how did they get away with it? Could I write about that? Where did that story go?

I like to tell myself that these types of questions are one of the things that make writers writers. You take something from life—maybe yours, maybe someone else’s—and you make it into art. It’s what painters do—freezing a face on a frame forever (who is Mona Lisa, anyway?). Do they think they’re nuts? Well, Van Gogh for sure, he was crazy, but in general, no. Still, though…

Then I was watching a documentary about a high school football team. They had an historic season, went right to the State finals and won. But the filmmaker couldn’t have known that when he started production or pitched the idea or raised the money. Nor could he have know about the kid from the wrong side of the tracks who would turn his life around. Or the kid from the right side of the tracks who’d descend into drugs. But he was there to tell a story, so he was hoping these sorts of things would happen—he must’ve been. And I thought that this was maybe worse: following someone’s life hoping something bad would happen was definitely worse than simply taking a leap from a real event into my imagination.

Right?

It’s so hard to know. Every major thread in my latest novel, The Good Liar, is somehow connected to 9/11 because the genesis of the idea for each of its threads is something connected to that event and its aftermath. When I first pitched the idea to my agent, she was worried it was exploitative of 9/11. I protested. What about Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close? What about The Goldfinch? Not that I was in the same league as those writers, but surely, it had been enough time for someone to write about something similar?

We bandied back and forth about it. I didn’t want to exploit the survivors and families of the victims. But I also didn’t want to abandon this idea. Is that the definition of exploitation? Probably somewhere. Probably yes.

So I made changes.

I set the book in Chicago. I made the tragedy an accident, and I tried not to steal imagery from that fateful day. And then I made it, in part about a film. One of the main characters is shooting a documentary set a year after a large gas explosion tears down a building. He’s following several families who lost people in the tragedy. That’s right; I put the exploiter right there in my story to distract from what I was doing. It’s something I often do. If I name a flaw, you might not notice the flaw.

That’s the theory, anyway.

I can see all the flaws in my work. And though writing is an act of faith—an act of hubris, even—there’s also a vampiric quality to it. When my husband was reading a late draft, I heard him laugh. When I asked him why he was laughing, he mentioned a characteristic of a character that shared something with him. I hadn’t even remembered that I put that in there, and that’s part of the trouble with writing. When you think of that perfect line, or that perfect description, sometimes it’s hard to tell whether it’s memory or talent that’s showing up on the page. (Like that line right there. I think I made it up, but just in case, I’m pointing it out.)

Publishing a book is an odd experience. I wrote The Good Liar in 2016, and then edited it in the first half of 2017. It was “done” six months ago. And so now it sits in the hands of a few readers who get early copies, their reviews coming in a couple at a time on blogs and Goodreads. Every time someone mentions a “9/11-like event” I hold my breath. Is this the review that’s going to call me out? Tell me I didn’t do my research? That I’m profiting off of someone else’s pain?

Life is pain. I do know I stole that—from The Princess Bride to be exact. And writing is pain too, the cataloguing of it, the transposing. Does it make a difference if it’s mine or someone else’s? Of course I get that it does, but in the selfish way of writers. By this I mean: the characters in the book are mine, “people” I invented. If you think they could be real—if you “like” them or don’t, for example—I win. I did my job. Once the book is done, I release them and then they are free to do what they want out in the world. They can make you feel good or bad or angry or sad or nothing at all.

And me? I’m pointing out my flaws.

Have a story genesis idea you’d like to share? The floor is yours.

[coffee]

Posted in

11 Comments

  1. Benjamin Brinks on April 24, 2018 at 9:49 am

    I love that premise! If that is theft, it is Grand Theft. And what is wrong with the way you’ve evolved it? Stories “based on true events” are projected onto screens. Story ideas spring continually from family, newspaper clippings, historical oddities…you name it.

    The challenge, of course, is to make the long novel as interesting as the short premise. That’s where “theft” becomes craft. Craft is something you cannot steal but only learn, practice and use.

    Looking forward to The Good Liar! And that’s the truth.



  2. Denise Willson on April 24, 2018 at 10:03 am

    Great post, Catherine.

    I don’t believe you can steal history. It is an experience in time, shared by the masses. No one, not even the victims (aren’t we all, to a certain extent, victims of 9/11?) can own an event.

    Still, I feel your concerns about treading lightly. This particular point in history is still quite fresh, delicate, and every person has a different way of processing.

    Perhaps, though, writing about these things is how we work our way through.

    Kudos to you for putting the hard stuff to paper.

    Dee Willson
    Author of A Keeper’s Truth and GOT (Gift of Travel)



  3. Lloyd Meeker on April 24, 2018 at 11:07 am

    Back in the 70’s there was a dam failure in Estes Park, CO, and a massive flood barreled down the Big Thompson Canyon, killing dozens and destroying homes and bridges — one just two miles from my home.

    In the aftermath, as the police asked for missing persons reports, it turned out that two or three men on the FBI’s most wanted list had happened to be vacationing in the Canyon at the time of the flood. Everyone had a good laugh.

    So the idea of disappearing during a tragic event is well established, it seems to me. Premise of your book sounds fascinating. Best of luck with it!



  4. anna on April 24, 2018 at 12:14 pm

    I believe much depends on voice or tone or the spirit that runs through your narrative. Even though 9/11 is still fresh and often raw in our minds, an approach that occupies the wide area between frivolity and despair can make the story convincing and worth reading.



  5. Vijaya on April 24, 2018 at 12:20 pm

    Catherine, loved your post and I look forward to reading your new book. I am glad you wrote despite some misgivings. The flaw would’ve been if you didn’t. Oddly enough 9/11 was the beginning of our family’s conversion to the Catholic faith, esp. for my husband. So, this national tragedy has a special place in my heart.

    I have a couple of historical fiction books that take place during difficult times in India’s more recent history. They are hard books to write for me. I am so much more comfortable writing silly picture books for little kids.



    • Anna on April 24, 2018 at 12:28 pm

      Courage, Vijaya. You can do it.



  6. Ruth Simon on April 24, 2018 at 1:17 pm

    Your post made me chuckle and wince at the same time.

    Like you, my brain often muses about possibilities from these kinds of events. I’ve learned to be selective in sharing some of the more grusome ideas it comes up with. And I often joke about “my broken brain” and say things like “Ut’s scary in here.” Your post, outlining concerns about exploiting the tragedy, is exactly why I hesitate. Plus, people get nervous about some of my speculations.

    I’ve also wondered about someone using that day as an excuse to vanish. I think I even saw news reports at the time that suggedted someone might do so. I’ve just never had the courage to explore that idea. I’ll be looking forward to your book.



  7. Tom Bentley on April 24, 2018 at 1:50 pm

    Catherine, years ago I lived with my girlfriend on a little Micronesian island. A couple of years after we left, we found that one of the expats we met there, a completely charming guy I liked a great deal, had faked his own death (drowning in his boat that he sank) after getting fired from his job in the US, leaving his family behind and ending up on this tiny island.

    And it turned out that he had not one, but THREE families. His own parents didn’t know he was alive until many years later.

    There are a lot more details, many crazy, to the story (and many other expats on the island who had shady stories themselves), but it’s one of those reinvention tales you allude to here.



  8. mshatch on April 24, 2018 at 6:31 pm

    You are not alone. I have often thought that a tragedy of some sort, an accident or explosion, would be the perfect opportunity for someone to shed their old identity and take on a new one, start fresh somewhere unknown.

    And yes, I imagine some of my google searches might raise some eyebrows.



  9. Deborah Makarios on April 24, 2018 at 7:09 pm

    Most of my book ideas are sparked by dreams. (There’s a lot of running…) Which is good, on the one hand, in that it looks more original at first glance; but is worrying on another level, because who knows where my subconscious got the idea from? Dreams don’t bother with bibliographies and citations.



  10. Patricia Dusenbury on April 24, 2018 at 7:44 pm

    I like the way you combined several observations and see nothing insensitive about it. If you’re a fiction writer, “What if?” comes to mind a lot. While at a concert, I noticed that two of the quartet members seemed to be exchanging glances, and not the two who were married. That was the genesis of a mystery story involving murder amongst musicians. Romance writers probably have slightly different thoughts while they’re observing their fellow human beings. ;-) Writers can’t help it.