Wax Poetic

By Kathleen Bolton  |  March 10, 2008  | 

This is how my backyard looked Sunday morning.

An ice storm rocked my area. Oh, it’s fun to live in the Northeast in winter. I didn’t realize the storm was happening until the power went out, which really messed up Movie Nite in our house. Luckily, we have a woodstove, and we spent about 10 minutes talking about pioneer days and how peoples’ eyesight must have been damaged from reading by candlelight before we gave up and went to bed.

In the morning we woke to the sounds of tree limbs snapping and snow plows salting the roads. And I went out and took some photos and starting writing long passages of descriptions in my head.

Then I remembered. For the most part, readers of modern fiction don’t care for long passages of description. Sure, the hush of snowfall and glittering branches struck me with nature’s awesome glory, but I bet you’re already bored with the subject. Like Elmore Leonard said in Rules 9 and 10 of his famous 10 Rules of Writing:

9. Don’t go into great detail describing places and things.

Unless you’re Margaret Atwood and can paint scenes with language or write landscapes in the style of Jim Harrison. But even if you’re good at it, you don’t want descriptions that bring the action, the flow of the story, to a standstill.

10. Try to leave out the part that readers tend to skip.

A rule that came to mind in 1983. Think of what you skip reading a novel: thick paragraphs of prose you can see have too many words in them. What the writer is doing, he’s writing, perpetrating hooptedoodle, perhaps taking another shot at the weather, or has gone into the character’s head, and the reader either knows what the guy’s thinking or doesn’t care. I’ll bet you don’t skip dialogue.

But wait, my muse is crying. I haven’t yet got to the part about the crunch of ice underfoot, the cold air screaming in my lungs.

I know. You don’t care.

But there is a place for description in the novel, otherwise you’re dropping the reader in a vacuum. They might not want to know about howling winds or windows spidery with frost, but they appreciate a taste of description. I think of description as an amuse bouche before you give them the red meat of the scene–the dialogue or knife fight or love scene.

In SELF-EDITING FOR FICTION WRITERS, authors Renni Browne and Dave King call this proportionality. [Check out our interview with Dave King HERE]. In the first draft, allow yourself room for digressions and textures. Then come back to the scene after some time has passed, and read it as if you were a reader not a writer. What bores you? Jumps out at you? If you have a big ole’ paragraph on how beautiful frozen branches are against a blue sky, chances are you can get that down to one or two sentences.

I broke another of Leonard’s rules. I opened with the weather.

1. Never open a book with weather.

If it’s only to create atmosphere, and not a character’s reaction to the weather, you don’t want to go on too long. The reader is apt to leaf ahead looking for people. There are exceptions. If you happen to be Barry Lopez, who has more ways to describe ice and snow than an Eskimo, you can do all the weather reporting you want.

Sorry.

Posted in

4 Comments

  1. Elena Greene on March 10, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    I enjoy description, especially if the author is doing world-building. If on the other hand the setting is a more ordinary one, I prefer descriptive bits that are short and sprinkled around. They can make good beats and if written in deep POV they reveal character.



  2. astrothsknot on March 10, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    As a reader, I don’t want to be reading a travelogue, especially in a SF/F novel. I want to read a story. Too many authors forget that the setting is just that, a setting.

    I’ve read way too many books where the characters or the plot were there just so the author could build his world. I object to that, I have an imagination that can do that for me. I just need someone to say, “Bloody hell, it’s freezing tonight!” and my scene is set.

    There was one set in a place called the Tenderloin and he’d spent half the book describing this place in such detail, I wanted to go there. Maybe I’d find the plot on my travels.



  3. Sean Ashby on March 10, 2008 at 10:00 pm

    It’s a fine line, I think (I, myself, am a recovering “describaholic”). Certainly, if you’re working in another world (or country, or time period), you might HAVE to describe SOME places or things that just don’t exist in our world.

    But like astrothsknot said, the reader’s imagination can fill in a lot more blanks than we often realize. Someone once said how they thought they “remembered” certain things from reading “The Chronicles of Narnia” as a kid, only to go back a re-read them as an adult and find that those parts just weren’t in there; his imagination had painted a bigger picture than Lewis’s own words ever could.



  4. Kathleen Bolton on March 11, 2008 at 6:57 am

    “But like astrothsknot said, the reader’s imagination can fill in a lot more blanks than we often realize. Someone once said how they thought they “remembered” certain things from reading “The Chronicles of Narnia” as a kid, only to go back a re-read them as an adult and find that those parts just weren’t in there; his imagination had painted a bigger picture than Lewis’s own words ever could.”

    Hm, that’s interesting, Sean. I think something similar occurred to me with Lord of the Rings. Funny how the mind fills in the blanks.

    I agree, Elena, that description is more effective in a beat. I’m no fan of the big description chunk…I guess as a reader I’m not so patient anymore. :-(